Ogden-Clearfield, UT · Weber County, UT · 264 properties with county records
This page: 0 views, fetched by 1 AI engine, citations not yet checked, 0 address lookups, since 2026-10-01 (server log began then).
Huntsville 84317 is in Weber County, UT, part of the Ogden Metro. The ZIP-wide typical value in Huntsville 84317 is $634,749 (Zillow Home Value Index, September 2026), up 3.9% from a year earlier. Homes that sold went under contract in a median 63 days, and 23% of listings took a price cut (Redfin Data Center, period ending Sep 30, 2026). On Lotvox's market-leverage reading of that data, with 12 months of supply, neither buyers nor sellers hold a clear edge. The Lotvox Turnover Index is not published for 84317 yet: it appears only where a held-out test on the county's recorded sales beats chance. Across Weber County's 9 ZIPs with a Zillow value, the middle one is $452,644, so 84317 sits 40% above the county middle. Lotvox holds county assessor records for 264 properties in 84317.
Headline value data through September 2026. Each source below carries its own date.
Is 84317 a buyer's or seller's market?
By Lotvox's leverage reading of Redfin data through Sep 30, 2026, 84317 is a balanced market. Homes went under contract in a median 63 days with 12 months of supply.
What do homes in 84317 sell for?
The ZIP-wide typical value in 84317 is $634,749 (Zillow Home Value Index, September 2026), up 3.9% in a year. County records put the median at about $785 per square foot (computed Jul 26, 2026).
Who is likely to sell in 84317?
Lotvox only publishes its Turnover Index where a held-out test on recorded sales beats chance, and 84317 has not passed that test yet. When it does, the score appears here.
How does 84317 compare to Weber County?
84317's ZIP-wide typical value of $634,749 compares with a middle value of $452,644 across Weber County's 9 ZIPs. Both are Zillow Home Value Index figures for September 2026.
Where does this 84317 data come from?
Values and rents come from Zillow's research data, sales pace from the Redfin Data Center, and property counts and turnover from county assessor and deed records. Each number on this page carries its own date, and the method is published at lotvox.com/methodology.
Cite as: Lotvox ZIP market record, 84317 Huntsville, UT, data through September 2026, https://lotvox.com/ogden/zip/84317
Listings Flow Ladder — 84317
Faucet, basin and drain — new listings in, active inventory, closed sales out.as of Sep 30, 2026
the basin is fillingnet 5 listings/mo
Faucet — new listings
9/mo
153% of normal (6) · gushing· baseline thin
Basin — active listings
48
200% of normal (24) · high· baseline thin
Months of supply
12 mo
derived — not published at this grain
Drain — closed sales
4/mo
100% of normal (4)· baseline thin
Net — faucet minus drain
+5/mo
filling
Reading
current
as of 2026-09-30
Compare against:2015-01-01 to 2019-12-31 · 5 same-month points
How plugged is the drain? Two definitions, both ours, deliberately not reconciled.
46%Absorption vs its own normal— 1 - (closed sales / active listings) / same-month median of that ratio
0%Closed sales vs its own normal— 1 - closed sales per month / same-month median closed sales per month
Closed sales over 24 months — two different numbers, deliberately not merged.
2/mofall in the monthly rate (29%)— peak 6/mo (2025-11-30) to 4/mo now
14transactions that did not happen— summed monthly shortfall vs the same-month normal, over 13 months below it (vs 2015-19 (COVID excluded))
rate_drop_from_peak is a change in the monthly rate; cumulative_shortfall_vs_normal counts transactions not transacted. They are different quantities and are not interchangeable.
2026-09-30
Redfin market data (county + ZIP), via Lotvox. As of 2026-09-30. Normal = same-month median of monthly rates, minimum 3 same-month points. Source window 3 months (flows shown per month). months_of_supply is not published at this grain (0 non-null rows measured); derived here as active listings / closed sales per month. A fresher supply-only read (6 new, 46 active, 2026-09-01, Realtor.com inventory (county + ZIP), via Lotvox) is available but is NOT used in the net — that source publishes no closed sales, so subtracting across it would mix two vintages.
Should you buy here?
buyer-timing lens
41affordability /100
Buyer leverage is balanced; weigh payment burden and the 3-lens valuation before bidding.
Payment burden
35.3%
stretched
Days on market
63
daily
Price cuts
23.4%
of active
Valuation
+28.6%
vs assessor
Days on market and price cuts: Redfin Data Center, rolling 90 days.
Not available for this ZIP — no rent or ownership-cost estimate published here.
Rent to price
Not available for this ZIP — no price-to-rent ratio published here.
58
/100
mixed
hot · balanced · prices rising year-over-year.
Verdict grades housing conditions; buyer-timing, investor cash-flow, supply-tightness and county macro scores answer different questions — each in its own section.
Buyer / seller
buyer-timing lens
Negotiate Hard
Needs 15% correction for affordability
DOM: 111d (falling) · Market Dynamics rolling median · hourly
Score Components
Payment Burden (25%)75
Valuation Gap (25%)10
Supply & Demand (20%)100
Cancellation Rate (10%)50
Days on Market (5%)100
Moderate buyer leverage in 84317. Room to negotiate 5-10% below list. Payment burden: 36.2% of median income. Median days on market: 111.
What to Offer
Offer 5-10% below list. You have room to negotiate.
Median price: Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI). Median rent: Census ACS county rent estimate. Days on market and active listings: Redfin Data Center, rolling 90 days.
Valuation
3 lenses, different anchors
vs assessor
+28.6%
Market vs assessed value — a tax-roll lag, not a deal signal.
Avg assessor$816,000
county CAMA · properties_v
vs income
—
Fair-value model not available for this market.
fair_value_scores · 10-state coverage
vs county comps
+93.6%
County-wide market — the widest, slowest signal.
Weber+93.6%
Lotvox comps · mv_valuation_gap
Read together: Above county comps but sustainable on local incomes.
in 5,097 · out 4,639 · Weber County, UT (parent county of this ZIP)
active inventory
as of 2026-07-01 · IRS SOI county-to-county migration flows 2022-2023 + Redfin inventory history
Price bands
mix-shift
Price Bands — the median behind the median
A single median rises whenever expensive homes become a bigger share of what sells, even if no tier got more expensive. These are the tiers underneath it, computed from recorded arms-length deed transactions in Weber.
Current tiers · 12 months to Invalid Datefloor 10 sales/tier
7 tiers had too few sales at every level and are left blank rather than estimated.
Tier
Median
$/sqft
Sales
Share
Source
Under $250k
—
—
—
—
fewer than 10 sales at zip, county and metro level
$250k–$500k
—
—
—
—
fewer than 10 sales at zip, county and metro level
$500k–$750k
—
—
—
—
fewer than 10 sales at zip, county and metro level
$750k–$1M
—
—
—
—
fewer than 10 sales at zip, county and metro level
$1M–$1.5M
—
—
—
—
fewer than 10 sales at zip, county and metro level
$1.5M–$2M
—
—
—
—
fewer than 10 sales at zip, county and metro level
$2M+
—
—
—
—
fewer than 10 sales at zip, county and metro level
No mix-shift history for this area. no geography from this ZIP up to metro has 8+ quarters of 10+ recorded arms-length sales across at least 4 price tiers. Trends are drawn only from recorded transactions; the last-sale snapshot above cannot carry a time series, because a property that sold twice keeps only its latest sale — which drags the history upward through the tiers and would invent the very mix shift this section exists to test for.
National context — not local
NAR's aggregate existing-home median for the United States and the West census region. This is the figure the tiers above are a check on. It is national/regional and says nothing about 84317.
United States
West
Copyright, National Association of Realtors. Reprinted with permission. Retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. FRED publishes a rolling 13-month window for these series.
Tiers computed from Lotvox parcel and deed substrate through Aug 25 (10 later months withheld as partially loaded). Sample floor 10 sales per tier; below it a figure is drawn from the county or metro and labelled, or left blank. Multi-parcel bulk deeds and duplicate records are excluded.
ZIP score grades housing; county score adds macro distress (jobs, debt, poverty). They answer different questions.
ZIP 84317→Weber County, UT
12-Month Direction
0Stable
Confidence
100%
DeterioratingStableImproving
BuildersLens Market Intelligence
Market Score
39· Weak
Market Score grades housing-market conditions (affordability, valuation, supply). The county Healthy/Moderate/Distressed badge measures economic distress (jobs, debt, poverty) — the two can read differently.
Payment Burden
35.3%
stretched
Source: Freddie Mac PMMS (FRED MORTGAGE30US) 7.32% · Zillow ZHVI · Census income · Updated 2026-10-22
Price-to-rent
38.4x
favors renting
Source: Zillow ZHVI ÷ (Zillow ZORI × 12)
Valuation0
+93.6%
overvalued
Source: Lotvox comps · Updated 2026-05-15
Supply/Demand
12 mo
buyer's market
Source: Redfin Data Center (ZIP): inventory ÷ monthly homes sold · Updated 2026-09-30
Insurance Risk
32/100
moderate
Source: FEMA/NFIP · Updated 2026-04
County distress indicators
ECONOMIC INDICATORS
Economic indicators are mixed relative to comparable U.S. counties.
Unemployment Rate
3.7%
UT 3.8%US 4.4%
Near national averages
Source: BLS LAUS · 2026-0860d ago
Poverty Rate
8.5%
UT 9.0%US 12.6%
Lower than most U.S. counties
Median Household Income
$87,083
UT $92,837US $82,006
Higher than most U.S. counties
Cost of Living (RPP)
100.5
UT 100.5US 100.3
Near national averages
Home Value (ZHVI)$465,682
County data: Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI), BLS, Census ACS, CDC, FBI UCR, Federal Reserve, USDA
Tenure by age of householder (ACS B25007) is not published below county. Any ZIP figure here is DERIVED from the county's age-specific owner rates applied to this ZIP's own age structure — never read directly.
Derived — this ZIP
11.0% in 2023
of owner-occupied homes have a householder 75 or older
