Park County, CO · 1,406 properties with county records
This page: 2 views, fetched by 0 AI engines, citations not yet checked, 0 address lookups, since 2026-10-01 (server log began then).
Hartsel 80449 is in Park County, CO, part of the Colorado Springs Metro. The typical home value in Hartsel 80449 is $395,204 (Zillow Home Value Index, August 2026), up 1.1% from a year earlier. Homes that sold went under contract in a median 304 days, and 19% of listings took a price cut (Redfin Data Center, period ending Aug 31, 2026). On Lotvox's market-leverage reading of that data, with 19.3 months of supply, neither buyers nor sellers hold a clear edge. The Lotvox Turnover Index is not published for 80449 yet: it appears only where a held-out test on the county's recorded sales beats chance. Across Park County's 10 ZIPs with a Zillow value, the middle one is $506,704, so 80449 sits 22% below the county middle. Lotvox holds county assessor records for 1,406 properties in 80449.
Headline value data through August 2026. Each source below carries its own date.
Is 80449 a buyer's or seller's market?
By Lotvox's leverage reading of Redfin data through Aug 31, 2026, 80449 is a balanced market. Homes went under contract in a median 304 days with 19.3 months of supply.
What do homes in 80449 sell for?
The typical home value in 80449 is $395,204 (Zillow Home Value Index, August 2026), up 1.1% in a year. County records put the median at about $269 per square foot (computed Jul 26, 2026).
Who is likely to sell in 80449?
Lotvox only publishes its Turnover Index where a held-out test on recorded sales beats chance, and 80449 has not passed that test yet. When it does, the score appears here.
How does 80449 compare to Park County?
80449's typical value of $395,204 compares with a middle value of $506,704 across Park County's 10 ZIPs. Both are Zillow Home Value Index figures for August 2026.
Where does this 80449 data come from?
Values and rents come from Zillow's research data, sales pace from the Redfin Data Center, and property counts and turnover from county assessor and deed records. Each number on this page carries its own date, and the method is published at lotvox.com/methodology.
Cite as: Lotvox ZIP market record, 80449 Hartsel, CO, data through August 2026, https://lotvox.com/colorado-springs/zip/80449
Listings Flow Ladder — 80449
Faucet, basin and drain — new listings in, active inventory, closed sales out.as of Aug 31, 2026
the basin is fillingnet 7 listings/mo
Faucet — new listings
10/mo
171% of normal (6) · gushing· baseline thin
Basin — active listings
58
223% of normal (26) · overflowing· baseline thin
Months of supply
19.3 mo
derived — not published at this grain
Drain — closed sales
3/mo
90% of normal (3)· baseline thin
Net — faucet minus drain
+7/mo
filling
Reading
current
as of 2026-08-31
Compare against:2015-01-01 to 2019-12-31 · 5 same-month points
How plugged is the drain? Two definitions, both ours, deliberately not reconciled.
57%Absorption vs its own normal— 1 - (closed sales / active listings) / same-month median of that ratio
10%Closed sales vs its own normal— 1 - closed sales per month / same-month median closed sales per month
Closed sales over 24 months — two different numbers, deliberately not merged.
3/mofall in the monthly rate (53%)— peak 6/mo (2025-10-31) to 3/mo now
17transactions that did not happen— summed monthly shortfall vs the same-month normal, over 16 months below it (vs 2015-19 (COVID excluded))
rate_drop_from_peak is a change in the monthly rate; cumulative_shortfall_vs_normal counts transactions not transacted. They are different quantities and are not interchangeable.
2026-08-31
Redfin market data (county + ZIP), via Lotvox. As of 2026-08-31. Normal = same-month median of monthly rates, minimum 3 same-month points. Source window 3 months (flows shown per month). months_of_supply is not published at this grain (0 non-null rows measured); derived here as active listings / closed sales per month. A fresher supply-only read (6 new, 65 active, 2026-09-01, Realtor.com inventory (county + ZIP), via Lotvox) is available but is NOT used in the net — that source publishes no closed sales, so subtracting across it would mix two vintages.
Should you buy here?
buyer-timing lens
31affordability /100
Buyer leverage is balanced; weigh payment burden and the 3-lens valuation before bidding.
Not available for this ZIP — no rent or ownership-cost estimate published here.
Rent to price
Not available for this ZIP — no price-to-rent ratio published here.
47
/100
mixed
stable · balanced · prices rising year-over-year.
Verdict grades housing conditions; buyer-timing, investor cash-flow, supply-tightness and county macro scores answer different questions — each in its own section.
Buyer / seller
buyer-timing lens
Negotiate Hard
Needs 33% correction for affordability
DOM: 229d (rising) · Market Dynamics rolling median · hourly
Score Components
Payment Burden (25%)90
Valuation Gap (25%)60
Supply & Demand (20%)40
Cancellation Rate (10%)100
Days on Market (5%)100
Moderate buyer leverage in 80449. Room to negotiate 5-10% below list. Payment burden: 41.9% of median income. A 16% price correction needed to reach 30% affordability threshold. Median days on market: 229. Market appears 11% overpriced vs. assessed values.
What to Offer
Offer 5-10% below list. You have room to negotiate.
in 454 · out 316 · Park County, CO (parent county of this ZIP)
active inventory
as of 2026-06-01 · IRS SOI county-to-county migration flows 2022-2023 + Redfin inventory history
Price bands
mix-shift
Price Bands — the median behind the median
A single median rises whenever expensive homes become a bigger share of what sells, even if no tier got more expensive. These are the tiers underneath it, computed from recorded arms-length deed transactions in Park.
Aggregate median +1.8% YoY in Denver, CO (metro), but the under-$500k tier is +0.0% — both the aggregate and the entry tier are rising. Over the same year the under-$500k share of sales moved from 36.3% to 34.8% (-1.4pp) and the $1M+ share from 11.6% to 12.8% (+1.1pp).
Current tiers · 12 months to Aug 25floor 10 sales/tier
7 tiers had too few sales in this ZIP and are shown at county or metro level — see the stamp on each row.
Tier
Median
$/sqft
Sales
Share
Source
Under $250k
$114k
$234
97
5.0%
COUNTY · Denver, CO
$250k–$500k
$405k
$345
764
39.4%
COUNTY · Denver, CO
$500k–$750k
$585k
$432
529
27.3%
COUNTY · Denver, CO
$750k–$1M
$840k
$501
287
14.8%
COUNTY · Denver, CO
$1M–$1.5M
$1.20M
$517
185
9.6%
COUNTY · Denver, CO
$1.5M–$2M
$1.65M
$531
44
2.3%
COUNTY · Denver, CO
$2M+
$2.64M
$730
31
1.6%
COUNTY · Denver, CO
All sales (the headline median)
$531k
$427
1,937
100%
COUNTY · Denver, CO
ZIP-level history was too thin to draw the tiers; served at metro level (Denver, CO), by quarter.
Share of sales by tier (quarterly)
If the upper tiers widen over time, the headline median rises on composition alone.
Under $250k
$250k–$500k
$500k–$750k
$750k–$1M
$1M–$1.5M
$1.5M–$2M
$2M+
Median within each tier, against the headline median (quarterly)
The blue line is the single number NAR-style reporting quotes. The gold lines are what each tier actually did. Log scale — the tiers span an order of magnitude, and on a log axis equal slopes mean equal percentage moves, which is the comparison being made.
Under $250k
$250k–$500k
$500k–$750k
$750k–$1M
$1M–$1.5M
$1.5M–$2M
$2M+
All sales (headline)
National context — not local
NAR's aggregate existing-home median for the United States and the West census region. This is the figure the tiers above are a check on. It is national/regional and says nothing about 80449.
United States
West
Copyright, National Association of Realtors. Reprinted with permission. Retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. FRED publishes a rolling 13-month window for these series.
Tiers computed from Lotvox parcel and deed substrate through Aug 25 (10 later months withheld as partially loaded). Sample floor 10 sales per tier; below it a figure is drawn from the county or metro and labelled, or left blank. Multi-parcel bulk deeds and duplicate records are excluded.
ZIP score grades housing; county score adds macro distress (jobs, debt, poverty). They answer different questions.
Park County
County-level context for ZIP 80449
Verified — Park County
Moderate (33)
ZIP 80449→Park County, COPop: 18,327
12-Month Direction
-19Moderate Deterioration
Confidence
100%
DeterioratingStableImproving
Why this score
BuildersLens Market Intelligence
Market Score
40· Weak
Market Score grades housing-market conditions (affordability, valuation, supply). The county Healthy/Moderate/Distressed badge measures economic distress (jobs, debt, poverty) — the two can read differently.
Payment Burden
44.8%
severe
Source: Freddie Mac PMMS (FRED MORTGAGE30US) 7.4% · Zillow ZHVI · Census income · Updated 2026-10-08
Price-to-rent
15.2x
neutral
Source: Zillow ZHVI ÷ (Zillow ZORI × 12)
Valuation8
+80.5%
overvalued
Source: Lotvox comps · Updated 2026-05-15
Supply/Demand
19.3 mo
buyer's market
Source: Redfin Data Center (ZIP): inventory ÷ monthly homes sold · Updated 2026-08-31
Tenure by age of householder (ACS B25007) is not published below county. Any ZIP figure here is DERIVED from the county's age-specific owner rates applied to this ZIP's own age structure — never read directly.
Derived — this ZIP
No ZIP figure — this ZIP spans 2 counties
NOT DERIVED: this ZIP spans more than one county. Tenure by age is not published below county, and no single county rate applies here. Weighting by area would produce a number, not a measurement - area is a poor proxy for where households are. Each county's own figure is shown instead.