Mesa County, CO · 128 properties with county records
This page: 2 views, fetched by 2 AI engines, citations not yet checked, 0 address lookups, since 2026-10-01 (server log began then).
Mesa 81522 is in Mesa, CO, part of the Grand Junction Metro. Homes that sold went under contract in a median 211 days, and 0% of listings took a price cut (Redfin Data Center, period ending Sep 30, 2026). On Lotvox's market-leverage reading of that data neither buyers nor sellers hold a clear edge. The Lotvox Turnover Index is not published for 81522 yet: it appears only where a held-out test on the county's recorded sales beats chance. Lotvox holds county assessor records for 128 properties in 81522.
Is 81522 a buyer's or seller's market?
By Lotvox's leverage reading of Redfin data through Sep 30, 2026, 81522 is a balanced market. Homes went under contract in a median 211 days.
What do homes in 81522 sell for?
The ZIP-wide typical value in 81522 is $715,000 (Zillow Home Value Index, null), up 0.0% in a year. County records put the median at about $97 per square foot (computed Jul 26, 2026).
Who is likely to sell in 81522?
Lotvox only publishes its Turnover Index where a held-out test on recorded sales beats chance, and 81522 has not passed that test yet. When it does, the score appears here.
How does 81522 compare to Mesa?
Lotvox does not hold enough ZIP-level values in Mesa to compare. The county page lists every covered ZIP.
Where does this 81522 data come from?
Values and rents come from Zillow's research data, sales pace from the Redfin Data Center, and property counts and turnover from county assessor and deed records. Each number on this page carries its own date, and the method is published at lotvox.com/methodology.
Cite as: Lotvox ZIP market record, 81522 Mesa, CO, https://lotvox.com/grand-junction/zip/81522
Listings Flow Ladder — 81522
Faucet, basin and drain — new listings in, active inventory, closed sales out.as of Sep 30, 2026
Thin market — under 25 active listings; ratios withheld
Faucet — new listings
—/mo
— of normal (—) · unknown
Basin — active listings
1
100% of normal (1) · balanced· baseline thin
Months of supply
—
derived — not published at this grain
Drain — closed sales
—/mo
— of normal (—)
Net — faucet minus drain
—
—
Reading
current
as of 2026-09-30
Compare against:2015-01-01 to 2019-12-31 · 1 same-month points
How plugged is the drain? Two definitions, both ours, deliberately not reconciled.
—Absorption vs its own normal— 1 - (closed sales / active listings) / same-month median of that ratio
—Closed sales vs its own normal— 1 - closed sales per month / same-month median closed sales per month
Closed sales over 24 months — two different numbers, deliberately not merged.
—/mofall in the monthly rate (%)— peak 0/mo (2022-11-30) to —/mo now
0transactions that did not happen— summed monthly shortfall vs the same-month normal, over 0 months below it (vs 2015-19 (COVID excluded))
rate_drop_from_peak is a change in the monthly rate; cumulative_shortfall_vs_normal counts transactions not transacted. They are different quantities and are not interchangeable.
2026-09-30
Redfin market data (county + ZIP), via Lotvox. As of 2026-09-30. Normal = same-month median of monthly rates, minimum 3 same-month points. Source window 3 months (flows shown per month). months_of_supply is not published at this grain (0 non-null rows measured); derived here as active listings / closed sales per month. A fresher supply-only read (0 new, 4 active, 2026-09-01, Realtor.com inventory (county + ZIP), via Lotvox) is available but is NOT used in the net — that source publishes no closed sales, so subtracting across it would mix two vintages.
Should you buy here?
buyer-timing lens
0affordability /100
Buyer leverage is balanced; weigh payment burden and the 3-lens valuation before bidding.
Payment burden
69.3%
severe
Days on market
211
daily
Price cuts
0.0%
of active
Valuation
-77.3%
vs assessor
Days on market and price cuts: Redfin Data Center, rolling 90 days.
Not available for this ZIP — no rent or ownership-cost estimate published here.
Rent to price
Not available for this ZIP — no price-to-rent ratio published here.
35
/100
weak
stable · balanced · prices rising year-over-year.
Verdict grades housing conditions; buyer-timing, investor cash-flow, supply-tightness and county macro scores answer different questions — each in its own section.
Buyer / seller
buyer-timing lens
Strong Buyer's Market
Needs 56.7% correction for affordability
Score Components
Payment Burden (25%)100
Valuation Gap (25%)100
Supply & Demand (20%)85
Days on Market (5%)100
Strong buyer leverage in 81522. If you must buy now, offer 10-15% below list price. Payment burden: 63.7% of median income. A 45% price correction needed to reach 30% affordability threshold. Median days on market: 100. Market appears 34% overpriced vs. assessed values.
What to Offer
Offer 10-15% below list price. Sellers are under pressure.
Conditions most similar to late 2007 — overvaluation without corresponding income growth. Significant correction potential.
STABLEBALANCED
Market is holding steady with balanced conditions. Conditions are balanced between buyers and sellers.
Address lookup
$99 report path
Look Up an Address in 81522
Just type the street — we'll auto-scope the search to ZIP 81522.
Median price: Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI). Median rent: Census ACS county rent estimate. Days on market and active listings: Redfin Data Center, rolling 90 days.
Valuation
3 lenses, different anchors
vs assessor
-77.3%
Market vs assessed value — a tax-roll lag, not a deal signal.
Avg assessor$162,580
county CAMA · properties_v
vs income
—
Fair-value model not available for this market.
fair_value_scores · 10-state coverage
vs county comps
+75.4%
County-wide market — the widest, slowest signal.
Mesa+75.4%
Lotvox comps · mv_valuation_gap
Read together: Above county comps but sustainable on local incomes.
in 1,295 · out 976 · Mesa County, CO (parent county of this ZIP)
active inventory
as of 2026-07-01 · IRS SOI county-to-county migration flows 2022-2023 + Redfin inventory history
Price bands
mix-shift
Price Bands — the median behind the median
A single median rises whenever expensive homes become a bigger share of what sells, even if no tier got more expensive. These are the tiers underneath it, computed from recorded arms-length deed transactions in Mesa.
Aggregate median +2.1% YoY in Mesa, CO (county), but the under-$500k tier is -3.0% — the rise is mix shift, not appreciation. Over the same year the under-$500k share of sales moved from 73.9% to 70.0% (-3.9pp) and the $1M+ share from 4.8% to 6.1% (+1.3pp).
Current tiers · 12 months to Aug 25floor 10 sales/tier
7 tiers had too few sales in this ZIP and are shown at county or metro level — see the stamp on each row.
Tier
Median
$/sqft
Sales
Share
Source
Under $250k
$150k
—
280
21.9%
COUNTY · Mesa, CO
$250k–$500k
$360k
—
613
48.0%
COUNTY · Mesa, CO
$500k–$750k
$585k
—
231
18.1%
COUNTY · Mesa, CO
$750k–$1M
$828k
—
74
5.8%
COUNTY · Mesa, CO
$1M–$1.5M
$1.20M
—
45
3.5%
COUNTY · Mesa, CO
$1.5M–$2M
$1.75M
—
13
1.0%
COUNTY · Mesa, CO
$2M+
$4.92M
—
20
1.6%
COUNTY · Mesa, CO
All sales (the headline median)
$385k
—
1,276
100%
COUNTY · Mesa, CO
ZIP-level history was too thin to draw the tiers; served at county level (Mesa, CO), by quarter.
Share of sales by tier (quarterly)
If the upper tiers widen over time, the headline median rises on composition alone.
Under $250k
$250k–$500k
$500k–$750k
$750k–$1M
$1M–$1.5M
$1.5M–$2M
$2M+
Median within each tier, against the headline median (quarterly)
The blue line is the single number NAR-style reporting quotes. The gold lines are what each tier actually did. Log scale — the tiers span an order of magnitude, and on a log axis equal slopes mean equal percentage moves, which is the comparison being made.
Under $250k
$250k–$500k
$500k–$750k
$750k–$1M
$1M–$1.5M
$1.5M–$2M
$2M+
All sales (headline)
National context — not local
NAR's aggregate existing-home median for the United States and the West census region. This is the figure the tiers above are a check on. It is national/regional and says nothing about 81522.
United States
West
Copyright, National Association of Realtors. Reprinted with permission. Retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. FRED publishes a rolling 13-month window for these series.
Tiers computed from Lotvox parcel and deed substrate through Aug 25 (10 later months withheld as partially loaded). Sample floor 10 sales per tier; below it a figure is drawn from the county or metro and labelled, or left blank. Multi-parcel bulk deeds and duplicate records are excluded.
ZIP score grades housing; county score adds macro distress (jobs, debt, poverty). They answer different questions.
ZIP 81522→Mesa County, COPop: 161,196
12-Month Direction
+8Stable
Confidence
100%
DeterioratingStableImproving
BuildersLens Market Intelligence
Market Score
33· Distressed
Market Score grades housing-market conditions (affordability, valuation, supply). The county Healthy/Moderate/Distressed badge measures economic distress (jobs, debt, poverty) — the two can read differently.
Payment Burden
69.3%
severe
Source: Freddie Mac PMMS (FRED MORTGAGE30US) 7.32% · Zillow ZHVI · Census income · Updated 2026-10-22
Price-to-rent
50.4x
favors renting
Source: Zillow ZHVI ÷ (Zillow ZORI × 12)
Valuation7
+75.4%
overvalued
Source: Lotvox comps · Updated 2026-05-15
Insurance Risk
34/100
moderate
Source: FEMA/NFIP · Updated 2026-04
County distress indicators
ECONOMIC INDICATORS
Economic indicators are mixed relative to comparable U.S. counties.
Unemployment Rate
4.6%
CO 3.8%US 4.4%
Near national averages
Source: BLS LAUS · 2026-0859d ago
Poverty Rate
11.9%
CO 9.4%US 12.6%
Near national averages
Median Household Income
$71,485
CO $94,510US $82,006
Near national averages
Cost of Living (RPP)
112.5
CO 111.8US 100.3
Higher than many comparable counties
Home Value (ZHVI)$436,551
County data: Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI), BLS, Census ACS, CDC, FBI UCR, Federal Reserve, USDA
Tenure by age of householder (ACS B25007) is not published below county. Any ZIP figure here is DERIVED from the county's age-specific owner rates applied to this ZIP's own age structure — never read directly.
Derived — this ZIP
No ZIP figure — too few owner households to state a share
DERIVED: this county's age-specific owner-householder rates applied to this ZIP's own age structure (ACS B01001, ZCTA). Tenure by age is not published below county. Assumes the ZIP's rates match its county's; only the age structure is local. THIN: only ~12 estimated owner households here, below the 100 floor — the share is not stated.
